Oedipus – a True Leader Is Born

A attractor is homogeneous a guide because others depend on him, he must be self-confident in his own abilities and be able to direct his followers towards their goal. maculation anyone can be a leader, a veritable leader is born, not made although certain qualities can be taught, a natural-born leader possesses the integral skill to command respect in a way a taught leader cannot. In Sophocles Oedipus the King, Oedipus shows himself to be a current leader. He is a great king and leader, as shown through with(predicate) the eradication of the Sphinx and the cleansing of the citys miasma.While Oedipus is ultimately the source of the citys woes, he remedy did all(prenominal) he could to find and purge the pollution from the city. Unlike Oedipus, Moses was not a natural-born leader. Moses did not possess faculty of commanding others rather, his capacity for leadership was endowed upon him by God. Before his life changing encounter with God, he was a meek man, aware of the in justice of the world but incapable(p) of doing anything about it. Thus, in comparison with Oedipus, Moses cannot be called a true leader. Their greenback lies essentially in the source of their powers. Oedipus is born to be a leader he is roundly self-reliant.No divine involvement bestows his abilities upon him. More than anything, the gods are against him. Since his contract violated the sacred pact between the guest and host, he has been cuss and doomed to a tragic end. Despite this, Oedipus innate skills are cool off able to bring him to his high status. With his intellect, he correctly answers the Sphinxs test that countless others failed to solve, thus thriftiness Thebes from the Sphinx and becoming king. Oedipus also possesses great resourcefulness. With all of the problems plaguing Thebes, he is not foolish enough to try to do everything by himself.He always knew the right people to ask for help. For example, he sends Creon to ask the oracle of Delphi the reason beh ind the plagues. Also, after hitting a dead-end, he sends for the fraud prophet, Tiresias, to aid in the investigation of Laius murder. Moses, on the other hand, is not a born leader. While Moses killed an Egyptian in defense of a Hebrew, he only wanted to pretend it never happened. He was incapable of steer the Hebrews in rebellion the only thing he could lead was sheep. He even admits his inability, making excuses to God and imploring, O my Lord, please send person else. (Ex. 413). It was only with Gods instruction that Moses was able to frame a leader with the power to free the Hebrews. Compared to Oedipus, who relies on his own powers, Moses pales in comparison, as everything he does is reliant on God. God commands Moses to free the Hebrews He allows Moses to perform miracles He sends the ten plagues and parts the Red Sea. Moses just uses His rowing and power, essentially acting as His puppet and the bridge between Him and His people. The distinction in strength between the two leaders is apparent through their respective relationships with their followers.Like a true leader, Oedipus has an overwhelming presence and commands the respect of his followers. When Oedipus says he will find and bring to justice Laius murderer, the citizens never waver or question him. Whether or not Oedipus has proof of god to support him does not matter to them in fact, they even believe in Oedipus over Tiresias, saying, simply that a mortal seer Tiresias knows more(prenominal) than I knowwhere Hath this been proven? Or how without sign assured, can I blame Him Oedipus who saved our verbalize when the winged songstress came, Tested and tried in the light of us all, like gold assayed?How can I now assent when a hatred is on Oedipus laid? (Socrates) Although Moses is also a successful leader in that he reaches his goal, his relationship with his followers is frail. When Moses goes up the mountain to receive the decennium Commandments from God, problems arise following h is absence. Without his presence, his followers stray from the right path and startle worshipping a golden calf, which contradicts their covenant with God. Moses can not hold the complete faith of his followers like Oedipus can. While anyone has the potential to become a leader, a true leader is one that is born.Without God, Moses would be nothing more than another of the Hebrews oppressed by the Egyptians. In reality, God could have chosen any of the other Hebrews and led them to the same result. Moses cannot be called a true leader because, although he leads the Hebrews, he is nothing more than an intermediary for God. The true leader is actually God. He is Moses guide and the perpetrator of the liberation of the Hebrews. Oedipus, on the other hand, proves himself to be a true leader. He achieves everythingdefeating the Sphinx, becoming king, saving Thebesthrough his own abilities and controls the complete respect of his followers.